Arab Oil Money's subversion of democracies targets the highest echelons

Jimmy Carter knows no limits in his war against the Jews. Seen here sucking up to arch Hamas terrorist Meshal

I've been wondering for some

time why the Clintons became highly critical of Israel? Of course for Hilary bashing Israel came with Obama's job, but her husband also did an about turn from being friendly towards Israel towards lambasting its prime minister Netanyahu and casting race tainted slurs on Jews based on their ethnicity:

Clinton said Arabs are the most pro-peace Israelis; then the Sabras, the Jewish Israelis born there; and then the Ashkenazi, the European Jews who came to Israel around the time of the country’s founding.
"The most anti-peace are the ultra-religious, who believe they're supposed to keep Judea and Samaria, and the settler groups, and what you might call the territorialists, the people who just showed up lately and they're not encumbered by the historical record,” Clinton said.
"That's what happened. Every American needs to know this. That's how we got to where we are," he noted. "The real cynics believe that the Netanyahu's government's continued call for negotiations over borders and such means that he's just not going to give up the West Bank."
However, Natan Sharansky, one of those Soviet immigrants, Clinton said, "who just showed up lately" and who Clinton presumably thinks does not want peace, said in response to CBSNews: "I am particularly disappointed by the president's casual use of inappropriate stereotypes about Israelis, dividing their views on peace based on ethnic origins."

What made Clinton change his tune from this?

Clinton has already publicly blamed Arafat for his failure to respond to Israeli peace proposals at Camp David, and instead returning to Ramallah to start a terror war against the Jewish State.

Has that whiff of Arab oil money which has corrupted political, diplomatic and academic life in the USA and Britain also descended on the Clinton family? How much influence does $2 billions buy?

The next time a Clinton opens his or her mouth think about just how much money from Arab tyrants flows into the family coffers. And when in the run up to new US elections Clinton proffers support for Israel, remember that Obama did likewise before he was elected President.

As for ex-president Carter his lifelong activism against the Jewish People and Israel can be first seen in his promoting of antisemitism in his 1950s preachings to Sunday school. Carter may have benefited enormously from Arab oil money but that is probably a sweetener for him in his life long crusade against Jews:

It’s hard for us to even visualize the prejudice against gentiles when Christ came on earth. If a Jew married a gentile, that person was considered to be dead. … How would you characterize from a Jew’s point of view the uncircumcised? Non believer? And what? Unclean, what? They called them DOGS! That’s true.

That Yeshivah University could give an award to such a man is beyond surprising.

The current wave of invective by academics in Europe and America towards Israel although owed not

a little to that ancient hatred of Jews, also owes much to half a century's worth of Arab countries undermining of western institutions through their oil wealth. Whole university departments are paid for by countries such as Qatar (eg Durham University) and Saudi Arabia (Georgetown University).

Any research on Islam and the Middle East is seen through a crooked prism, distorted by those who hold the purse strings. Of course the Universities involved deny that the money brings influence. Who are they kidding?

That miniscule democracy of Israel no larger than New Jersey and containing just 6 million Jews surrounded by hundreds of millions of Arabs seeking its death at every opportunity has had little chance to be understood in the West.

This is especially so since Russia and its Arab allies hit on the scheme to invent a people more tiny than Israel, the Palestinian Arabs. There never was a Palestinian people, and they mostly identify themselves with Egypt Saudi Arabia or Jordan and hold the passports of those countries. Yet the duped massed will never know that, in the face of a media beholden to the Arab message whether through financial interests

in the Arab world such as Reuters-Thompson and CNN or the loathsome BBC.

For example when he was Pres Clinton praised Israel for commitment to peace, yet afterwards said Israel

is the problem.

The Clinton Foundation is of course bathed in Arab money, as is Carter's. The Clintons have grown personally very rich on Arab oil money.

And now the emails are revealing that Mrs Clinton's frequent attacks on Israel when Obama's Sec of State were linked not just to Obama's hatred of Israel but her anti-Israel Jewish advisor Sid Blumenthal.

He regularly forwarded emails from his Israel baiting son Max to Mrs Clinton when not personally bashingIsrael himself.

 And with the Iranian nuclear fiasco presided over by Mr Kerry, he has been somewhat quiet about his own family's profitable links to Iran

The can of worms that is the Arab and Islamic oil lobby in the USA is as rotten as it is widespread.

So why does the MSM never deal with the foreign and malign lobby carried out by America's Arab enemies, but instead constantly harp about the homegrown AIPAC that lobbies on behalf of US ally Israel?

We're back to money and the old hatred of anti semitism something Obama himself is only too happy to promote:

 Murmuring about “money” and “lobbying” and “foreign interests” who seek to drag America into war is a direct attempt to play the dual-loyalty card. It’s the kind of dark, nasty stuff we might expect to hear at a white power rally, not from the President of the United States—and it’s gotten so blatant that even many of us who are generally sympathetic to the administration, and even this deal, have been shaken by it.

 As Obama attempts to pass his disastrous nuclear surrender to Iran no holds are barred even antisemitic slurs.

Is Obama looking forwards to his post presidency? If so he should remember that Arabs do not see black people as equals, even using the term 'Slave' ('Abd') to denote them. The Saudis and other Arab countries are importing slaves from Africa at this very moment.

The Arab oil pickings for Obama might not be as profound as those Carter and the Clintons have enjoyed.

Israel's Ethiopian Jews refuse to adopt victimhood politics and violence

The Ethiopian community in Israel is to be congratulated for refusing yesterday to take the example of many in the community of black people in the United States, where 30% of black males have at one time or another been in prison (1 in 12 presently), and where throughout a lifetime, a black male has a 1 in 21 chance of dying violently.

Israel is not the USA with Black people in Israel not having the same sorry history as Black people in the USA. Ethiopian Jews were not brought to Israel as slaves, but as free men and women in order to fulfill their zionist aspirations, to save their lives. They were brought out of love and not hatred or of any intention to humiliate or discriminate against them. 

Israel put many of its citizens in harms way by sending its armed forces and civilians into extremely anti-Israel Sudan and Ethiopia in order to rescue the Ethiopian Jews from starvation that killed hundreds of thousands of people.

Every society has its problems and Israel is not an exception, but racism has not, and will not define the relations between black and white communities as it has done in Europe and the USA. Ethiopian Jews were not rescued and brought to Israel in order to be discriminated against and those who are undoubtedly suffering now and have not yet succeeded in society must realise that. They need help so that they too can succeed in Israel. Much is done by the State within its limited budget and with the bringing of this issue to the fore, much more will hopefully happen to raise this community up.

Israel is not such a country in decline and Ethiopian Jews are also not seldom successful in Israel, and will undoubtedly continue to succeed. There are senior officers in the IDF, scientists and doctors among the community. For example the head of the IDF intervention team in Nepal was an Ethiopian Jewish doctor Dr. Avi Yitzchak. All is not doom and gloom.

Ethiopian Jews at yesterday's demonstration cleaerly showed that the violence seen in Baltimore and Ferguson is not the example they want to follow. Looting and destruction is the hallmark of a society in decline and offers no hope for those who use it. Ethiopian Jews are protesting for their future success, not in order to destroy the efforts of those who have already succeeded before them.

The promotion of victimhood and violence is alien to Israel, and thankfully even the Ethiopian demonstrators who split off from the peaceful demonstration to seek confrontation were open to reason and eventually returned to demonstrate peacefully.

The destructive Malcolm X / Black Panther style promotion of victimhood and fomenting of hatred is all to easy. It is a reverse racism, as ugly as the phenomenon it purports to condemn, and Israel last night rejected it. Thankfully the Ethiopian Jews of Israel will not be seduced by hate and destruction.

Enemies of Jews have never worried about whether that Jew is black or white, Sephardi or Ashkenazi. Being a Jew suffices, and Israel's wise leaders realise that, and condemned the police who sparked off the demonstrations.

The rabbis talked of Sinat Chinam (Unjustified/unreasonable/unreasoning hatreds and the destruction of the Temple and warned against those who are determined to feed off a cynical nursing of a sense of victimhood.

Ethiopian Jews refuse to be used as the vanguard in a new attempt to split the Jewish nation apart.

They did not come to Israel in order to be instrumental in its demise, but to build it along with Sephardi and Asheknazi Jews who returned home at an earlier date.

The EU and George Tsoros sponsored anarchists in Israel surely suffered a great defeat last night. As with the cost of living protests a couple of years ago, Israel's enemies fish in troubled waters but Israel is stronger and its people will not be corralled into the self-destructive behaviour seen abroad that Israel's enemies would have it do.

Egypt needs less meddling by Shariah Compliant Obama

Whilst the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during President Morsy's democratic government was in power these scenes were repeated throughout Egypt. Obama's response was to send Morsy Apache helicopters, Abrams tanks and F16s.

The Obama administration that lifted sanctions on Burma which then went on to murder thousands of Kachin Christians in an ongoing genocide has a soft spot for murderous Muslim Brotherhood regimes.
Not for nothing was Mohamed Elbiary who is a member of the MB made a director of Homeland Security in the US. The US security agencies are riddled by extremist muslims placed there by Obama's cronies. Elbiary famously declared the USA to be an 'Islamic country', shariah compliant.

Nobody can be happy at countries where the respect for human rights is so low that people are sentenced to death in batches. But this is the reality of the arab world, where if your regime is not ruthless it will not survive.

Obama did not make one protest to deposed ex-President Morsy at the mass murders of innocents in Tahrir Square and throughout Egypt whilst he was in charge. Morsy's salafist thugs cruised around cities arresting those they thought were contravening shariah law. They made sure such persons were never seen again.
Morsy's men murdered people of the tiny Shia community and Coptic Christians alike. Coptic young women have for years been kidnapped, forcibly converted to islam and 'married' off to salafists.

Christians human rights throughout the world have as usual been ignored by the Obama administration, whether in Pakistan or Indonesia, just as the murder of Jews by islamic terrorists in France was described simply as "some random folks" by Obama.

There is a worrying pattern of this President's interference or at times silence in Arab countries whilst lambasting the Jewish State at every opportunity. Obama wished to tie the American horse to sunni islamists notable Turkey and Egypt allied to Iranian interests, but when that fell apart with Morsy's overthrow, and Turkey's incresing isolation, Obama increasingly has decided to throw the USA into Iran's orbit.  It is only in these terms that Obama's desperation to get a nuclear deal from Iran, any deal can be explained.


After all the Obama administration has done to destabilize the Middle East and Asia, it's a good idea if the Arabs are left to get on with their gruesome tasks. Sadly it is in all our interests, even if not in Obama's.

Egypt and its backer Saudi Arabia realize that the alternative to mercilessly crushing the Muslim Brotherhood is to face another mass breakout from prisons in future and the collapse of Egypt and other Arab states.

However hateful are the remaining arab regimes not yet involved in the maelstrom Obama unleashed by effectively deposing Mubarak, at least they offer some semblance of order in relation to the Iran and Sunni terrorist inspired chaos now ruling in Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

We may be disgusted but Arab dictators know their work. For the near future brutal and despotic Arab regimes are the only game in town. The alternative is a further meltdown, millions more refugees along with mass death being the result.

And Obama will be gone soon, but not before his wrongheaded policies have wreaked even more devastation upon the Middle East and the world.

The United States said it was “deeply concerned” about former Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi’s death sentence Sunday, joining a growing list of countries and international groups who have condemned Saturday’s court decision to execute the former leader.

Judge Shaaban el-Shami sentence Morsi and over 100 others to death Saturday over a mass prison break during the 2011 uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak and later brought Islamists to power for the first time in Egypt.

Before a death penalty decision can be finalized against Morsi or the over 100 other defendants included in El-Shami’s decision, however, the case must be reviewed by Grand Mufti of Egypt Shawki Ibrahim Abdel-Karim Allam, according to Egyptian law.

Though the decision is not yet final, the ruling has drawn a chorus of international condemnation, joining Washington, Hamas and a host of others in opposition to the execution.

“We are deeply concerned by yet another mass death sentence handed down by an Egyptian court to more than 100 defendants, including former President Morsi,” a State Department official told Reuters Saturday.

“We have consistently spoken out against the practice of mass trials and sentences, which are conducted in a manner that is inconsistent with Egypt‘s international obligations and the rule of law,” a State Department official told AFP.

Noting that they were preliminary sentences, the official added: “We continue to stress the need for due process and individualized judicial processes for all Egyptians in the interests of justice.”

The ruling applies to 120 people in total, including 70 Palestinians, and is the latest in a series of mass death sentences handed down since the military overthrew Morsi nearly two years ago. The sentence will likely further polarize Egypt, a longtime US ally grappling with an Islamist insurgency that has intensified since Morsi’s overthrow.

In what appears to be the first violent response to the ruling, suspected Islamic militants gunned down three judges and their driver in the northern Sinai Peninsula city of al-Arish, according to security officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/us-deeply-concerned-by-death-sentence-for-egypts-morsi/

Britain sacrificed Czechoslovakia in 1938, but couldn't do the same to Poland as it was treaty bound to come to its defense

Below is an interesting article but I believe wrong when arguing that the Kindertransport had any effect on the British People's attitudes to the nazis. Kristallnacht possibly had a great effect. Britain entered the war as it was treaty bound to come to the defense  of Poland when attacked, and moreover because Britain realised that no matter what was sacrificed to nazi aggresion there was no sating it, no limit to Hitler's aggression, so Britain might as well do the decent thing for Poland and declare war on Germany.

Before WWII British feelings were mixed regarding Germany. As in the USA there was much support for fascism, especially amongst the elite, and even more support for keeping out what they saw as a european problem.
To some extent Britain's reluctance to get involved in europe is understandable when considering that Britain had lost a million men only 25 years beforehand.
The Jewish Community then is however marked by cowardice, then for the refusal by its leaders in the USA and Britain to raise hell for jews suffering under the nazis. We see the same now in the defence of Israel, where famous artists such as Fry and Jonathan Miller preferring instead of supporting Israel when under attack from all sides,  to try and curry favor with Israel's detractors, to latch onto the refrain about 'wicked' Israel and the 'occupation'. 
There are of course other jewish personalities like Howard Jacobson and Woody Allen who recognise the new antisemitism for what it is, and are unafraid to give their opinions about it.

The author is of course right about Hannah Arendt's soundbite about Eichmann epitomizing the “banality of evil”. Those who met Eichmann such as Joel Brand related that they felt when in his presence in terror of their lives. 
One man, "Dr. Senator, who didn't stand when Eichmann entered the room; Eichmann told him that if he wasn't gone from Austria within the day he'd be sent to a camp"." (When Eichmann was finally captured, a religious cabinet minister Dr. Yosef Burg worried that trying Eichmann would ruin Israel's image in the world. His son Avraham Burg took things further by leaving Israel and missing no opportunity to pander to Israel's enemies, whether about the supposed illegitimacy of jewish life in their ancestral homeland Judea and Samaria or generally about israeli democracy).


By Fred Barschak

On November 9 1938, a Wednesday, at the age of seven years and eight months, I was standing at my bedroom window looking across the street where, some 25 yards away, the synagogue, the famous Schiffschul, was burning. Unknown to me, so were
 22 other synagogues and some 60 shtiebls in Vienna alone.

Four-and-a-half weeks later, on a Friday afternoon, December 10, together with hundreds of other children aged from three to 17, I boarded a train and began a two-day journey that ended with a boat-trip landing us at Harwich.
 The experience of these two events, the one arising directly from the other, certainly lends a certain perspective to one’s recollection and, 75 years on, some things, dimly perceived at the time and even more dimly understood, have become clearer.

In many cases, parents told their children that the separation would not be that long, that they would be joining them sooner or later. In fact, only some 3,000 of the 9,739 children ever saw their parents again. And certainly the older children, seeing the forced smiles and hidden tears, had some idea of what the parents were saying and especially what they were not saying.

There was a very considerable difference between the experience of the German and Austrian communities. The Jews in Austria had had a very real taste of the “Kristallnacht medicine” ever since the first hour of the Anschluss in March 1938. The norms of civilised or even semi-civilised behaviour had long since been abandoned in post- Anschluss Austria.

But, in Germany, things were very different. In his book, Last Waltz in Vienna, George Clare pointed out that, even after Kristallnacht, arriving in Berlin was like landing on another planet. You could actually go to a coffee house without encountering the ubiquitous Juden unerwünscht (Jews not welcome) signs — plastered everywhere in Vienna, but not everywhere in Berlin. The point is that, before Kristallnacht, life in Germany was very unpleasant, but dangerously bearable.

Which explains why, in the six years between Hitler’s coming to power on January 30 1933, and Kristallnacht on November 8 1938, out of 600,000 Jews, barely 100,000 had emigrated, whereas, after that watershed, apart from the children, approximately 140,000 managed to get out of Germany. Three hundred thousand did not.

So, to that extent, while Kristallnacht led directly to the death of 90 Jews, with a further 1,000 victims who succumbed to their treatment in Dachau and Buchenwald, where 30,000 had been immediately incarcerated, by making clear that there was no possible future for those who thought things couldn’t get worse, Kristallnacht actually saved lives. The flames of the burning buildings illuminated the writing on the wall.

What was truly irreplaceable, and hit the Jewish communities like a volcanic eruption, was the destruction, within 24 hours, of 200 synagogues, together with 750–800 shtiebls (buildings each capable of holding some 100 people,) and their contents, some 10,000 sifrei Torah, all of which signalled the end not just of religious life, but also the destruction, even for non-religious Jews, of their communal life in Germany and Austria.

There was one thing that both groups of Jews had in common — a frantic attempt to get their children away.
 The first Kindertransport train left Berlin with 200 children on December 2. But it was the first train from Vienna, which left at about 11.45pm on a Friday evening, December 10, that had a direct bearing on a very old controversy. This dates from 1961, when Hannah Arendt, covering the Eichmann trial for the New Yorker magazine, coined the ineffable phrase, “the banality of evil”.

This refers to two of the most prominent points in Eichmann’s defence. What does Eichmann actually say? He says first, I was a mere cog in a wheel, concerned with efficient transport arrangements; second, I was following orders and, third, I had no particular animus against Jews, i.e. I would have transported Chinese or Hottentots if so ordered. It remains extraordinary that this hugely experienced journalist accepted Eichmann’s presentation at face value.

But it is the third of his claims that relates directly to the December 10 Kindertransport. The true story was revealed in 1968 by Vera Weismuller, the wife of a Dutch Catholic banker, and hugely involved in organising Kindertransports.
 She arrived in Vienna on or about December 3, carrying with her the priceless permissions for 600 children to board the train for Britain. On arrival, she was immediately incarcerated in one of the cells in the infamous Hotel Metropole — the SS and Gestapo headquarters.

In the morning, she was ushered into the presence of Eichmann; but not before she was subjected to a “personal” search by two Gestapo women. He then asked her: “Do the children know that they are going?” When she replied “Yes”, he asked: “Do the parents know the children are going?” When she replied “Yes”, he said: “Then you may take the children, but there is one condition: they must travel on Saturday.”

At first sight, the order was so obviously aimed at those, probably about 50 per cent of the children, who came from Orthodox backgrounds, and one is tempted to say that, thank God, he was unaware that even the most Orthodox Jew is enjoined to set aside the laws of Shabbat for the purpose of saving life. But, of course, it wasn’t aimed only at the Orthodox; families who were certainly not observant still had a Friday-night family meal, and it was not a proper Friday night without their children, so they, too, were targeted by Eichmann’s order.

Now there are dozens of examples of Eichmann’s dedicated pursuit of Jews, in matters much more severe than an order to travel on Saturday. But one thing unites them all. The infliction of gratuitous pain is the common feature of all Eichmann’s actions, and is completely at variance with his claim of an absence of animus against Jews.

And what about the children once they got to England? When I addressed the who’s who of Anglo-Jewry on March 9 1988 at the Wiener Library, where we commemorated the 50th anniversary of the Anschluss, I felt obliged to point out that the Kindertransport did not represent Anglo-Jewry’s finest moment of glory.

In the nine months during which the children arrived, there were living in Great Britain, in varying degrees of affluence and poverty, some 125,000 Jewish families. Of the 9,739 children, about 4,500 were accommodated in hostels, 3,000 were offered a home by Jewish families, and about 2,300 were accommodated in non-Jewish households. Since the organisers tried their best to get Jewish children placed with Jewish families, 3,000 Jewish families offered to take a refugee child in, and 82,000 families did not.

Now it is certainly the case that many of these families could not afford to make the offer — but many could, and didn’t. It was this extraordinary refusal by so many to rise to the occasion that caused Chief Rabbi Hertz, in January 1939, to state that he wished he could say that he had found as much support in his work of rescuing Jews from Europe among the Jewish community as he had among many in the non-Jewish community. This makes the contribution of those British Jews who did put their shoulder to the wheel all the more praiseworthy.

This year, there have been many detailed accounts of the contribution which the children and the refugees generally have made, in every field of endeavour.

But there is perhaps one contribution that the Kinder made without their ever being aware of it. And it is this; when Chamberlain returned from Munich in September 1938, he was greeted and cheered as if he were a visiting Messiah. And yet, when the scales were finally removed from his eyes and he decided to confront Hitler after the occupation of Czechoslovakia on March 15 1939, he found that he had a majority of the British public behind him.

Now historians are quite clear that the reason for the abandonment of the policy of appeasement was, indeed, the occupation of Czechoslovakia. But that does not explain the complete change in public opinion. So what exactly were the major events that took place between September 1938 and March 1939? There were, in fact, only two: Kristallnacht and the Kindertransports.

What in fact happened is that the British public felt cheated. They thought they had signed up for “Peace in our time”. What they got instead was a pogrom in the heart of modern Europe, and a picture of children, including toddlers, walking down a gangplank at Harwich clutching their pathetic suitcases.

A feeling began to spread that “it’s not right”, and this may partly explain why it was that when Chamberlain declared war in 1939, and one year later when Churchill was left to fight that war, the climate of opinion had changed sufficiently for them to have a reasonably united nation behind them.

The two events may have played only a very small part in that change of opinion, but a part they surely played.

The latest islamist conspiracy theory: The FBI carried out the Boston bombings

Along with the 9/11 atrocity, this jihadist website wishes us to believe that fanatical muslims weren't responsible for the Boston bombing, that the two young chechniyan men were just innocents gunned down by US agents. 

You have to read the whole thing to get inside the conspiracy which interestingly enough was begun by a far right american website. Do islamists actually believe that US security forces blew up an american event? It is more likely that this is used for purposes of Taqiyya, the koranic islamic precept of deceiving the infidel when necessary by disowning responsibility, by throwing responsibility onto others, by denying what you believe in. And the islamists will always find their willing stooges such as Mrs Clinton who never tired of promoting islam as a 'religion of peace'. Maybe after repeating this lie often enough she began to believe it. Strangely enough Clinton never referred to christianity or judaism in such glowing terms.

But many muslims will swallow the conspiracy theories whole. Soon enough the jews will be brought into the conspiracy, and this will be the source of a new grievance against jews and the West, for making up allegations about muslims. 

It should be clear however that the West is under attack and that Obama has shackled the US security agencies by not allowing them to even use the term islamic terrorist, to profile potential terrorists and to track them in the mosques where they are indoctrinated on theway to becoming jihadist fighters and bombers. Indeed Obama thinks the USA should arm jihadists in Syria, in Turkey and Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood there has just taken delivery of 200 Abrams tanks and 20 more F16's to add to the 200 they already possess.

That the FBI failed even after having had this pair of jihadists delivered to them by the Russian secret service the FSB is an indictment not only upon the FBI but upon the policy of not investigating and suppressing the source of the terror in the madrassas and the mosques. 

The foolish indulgence of islamist fanatics of CAIR and the v in european has to end sometime, hopefully not after the war against the radicalization of muslims has been lost. 

Moderate islam is being extinguished by Saudi Arabia and its western stooges.

 Was it the FBI which bombed the Boston Marathon?

Publication time: 20 April 2013, 14:41

According to an American information portal Natural News, the Boston Marathon could have been blown up by an FBI affiliated American military organization "The Craft".

In an article dated April 19 and entitled "Total media blackout now under way on most likely suspects in Boston marathon bombing", the portal writes in particular:

"In a story that's almost as explosive as the actual bombing itself, the mainstream media is waging a total media blackout on the photos of "The Craft" private military operatives who were present at the Boston marathon bombing.

NaturalNews.com and InfoWars.com have published a multitude of photos which absolutely prove that numerous members of "The Craft" private military contractors were actively engaged in operations at the finish line of the marathon.

This is photographic proof. In real police work, it's called "evidence." But astonishingly, there is not a single mention of "The Craft" in any mainstream media outlet: not NYT, not Washington Post, not LA Times, etc. Not a single word.
 
This is quickly becoming the biggest media cover-up of all time.

A photo showing a backpack belonging to a member of "The Craft" is identical to the FBI promoted backpack of a Chechen with purported bomb inside



***
FBI now pushing a false script rather than pursuing real evidence.
 
The FBI is also deeply engaged in the cover-up, selectively choosing the publicize photos of the patsies who are scripted to take the fall.

As part of its cover-up, the FBI has announced "other photos will not be deemed credible."

Huh? The only photos that count are the ones you say count? How is that an "investigation?"

So even though we have a multitude of photos now showing at least ten men wearing combat uniforms, black backpacks and tactical gear, the FBI has no interest in these people! Even though we have already proven through photographic evidence that one of them is carrying a radiation detector and that nearly all of them are carrying black backpacks.
 
Reporter censored at press conference.
 
Dan Bidondi, an Infowars.com reporter based on the East Coast, attempted to show photos of "The Craft" operatives during a public press conference and was immediately censored by government agents holding up clipboards to block his photos.
 
Incredible! No photos from the event that are not selected by the FBI are allowed to be shown!
 
Click here to watch the video report.
 
It begs the question: What is so dangerous about these photos of "The Craft" that a nationwide media blackout is being waged?
 
If there's a simple, innocent explanation for all this, why would it be a problem to show the photos? Beware of any media outlet or government department that tells you "You can't see THESE photos. That's not allowed!"
 
We would like to note that seditious photos of the members of the FBI unit "The Craft" could be viewed at Natural News on the following link, without permission from the US federal government.

Israel sends the strongest message yet to Iran and the world

The new government of Israel has no illusions about the arab world and its so-called 'spring'. And when it comes to Iran Netanyahu now has the political backing he needs at home for the tough decisions he needs to take.

Gone is that disastrous appeaser Barak, a man who brought down a number of humiliations on Israel, whilst never losing confidence in his ability to gain peace through yet another concession and another withdrawal.

When Barak needed to show force he used it not against arabs waging a low intensity war of attrition against jews, who kill jews whenever the opportunity arises, but rather against the jewish community living in our ancient homelands of Judea and Samaria, jews who literally sit on the outpost of western civilisation and defend it from the barbarous arab islamic hordes.

Be in no doubt, if Israel were ever to give up Judea and Samaria ('West Bank'), this would mean the end of Israel, throttled by an indefensible rump of a country with arabs sitting on the heights with missiles to prevent Israel's air force from taking off. Barak should have learned this lesson of 1973 when israeli pilots were decimated by russian missiles.

And in these days of resurgent islam, Israel is only the 'little satan'. Both europe and the USA are not forgotten but not necessarily to be conquered by violent jihad. Demography, the hollowing out of societies through the muslim birth rate after mass immigration is also a legitimate form of jihad, preferable where possible:

Dawa, the call to Islam that by Islamic law must precede jihad, is all-too-often dismissed, as are its manifestations under the rubric of non-violent jihad, simply because this kind of assault does not kill. Instead, it intends “merely” to subjugate.
Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, told a Toledo, Ohio, Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in 1995, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa.”

With the EU finally realising that there is no way that Iran will give up on its nuclear weapons program, peaceful means have all but been exhausted to stop Iran. Had China, Russia and others not worked to break the sanctions against Iran, then the sanctions might have succeeded, but that has not happened. A new and harsh tone is coming out of Israel, but it is improbable that Israel can now deter the mullas through threats alone. The years of Barak, Olmert and also Netanyahu's last government have served to lull our enemies into a belief that as with the USA, Israel will not defend its essential interests, has not the will to take on Iran.

Nevertheless both Israel's defence minister Yaalon and its pm Netanyahu have on Yom Hazikaron both sent a less than veiled warning to Iran, I believe the harshest to date:

(Netanyahu ) "Today, too, there are those who threaten to annihilate us -- they haven't succeeded in the past, they won't ever succeed", he said.

Netanyahu seemed to be alluding to Iran, which Israel believes is working toward achieving military nuclear capabilities and has issued countless threats to annihilate the Jewish state.

"If we have no choice, we will grasp our swords and go to battle," Netanyahu said, in one of the more sternly worded warnings he has issued to date.

(Yaalon) "Terrorist attacks, the firing of rockets at civilian populations and delegitimization campaigns are the challenges which stand before us in the years to come, they will accompany us for the foreseeable future and they will force us to respond with a firm hand."

"The nuclear program of a country which glorifies Jew-hatred and the destruction of the State of Israel is in its end stages, and if it is not dealt with, it will threaten Israel, the Middle East, and the entire world with viable nuclear weapons.It is now recognised that Iran can build nuclear weapons, has the materials and the knowledge to deliver them, possibly using ballistic missiles."

Only the warning from Netanyahu at the UN, after US President Obama refused to set any red lines for Iran, prevented Iran from entering the final stage of building an atomic weapon. But how long can the world live on tenterhooks, depending on fallible intelligence agencies to give warning when Iran will cross the line to assemble its weapons?

With Iran's latest rejection of the world's generous offers in return for giving up weapons, the nettle must be grasped. The US should act, and failing that, Israel should do what it can with its lesser capabilities to destroy the iranian war machine. If that involves Israel destroying the Iranian economy using an EMP weapon for want of any other alternative, Iran has only itself to blame. It is in any case believed that the Iranians are seriously considering such an attack themselves,

w

Israel's love for America is reciprocated but arab indoctrination is making inroads

The latest Gallup poll shows that americans are becoming increasingly pro-Israel. Whereas last year 61% of americans professed to be pro-Israel, on the eve of Obama's visit this has risen to 64%. And this is in the face of a president who loses no opportunity to criticize Israel, who called into question Israel's very existence in the face of its so-called 'intransigence' recently, and where the mass media apart from Fox news  is solidly anti-Israel.

That americans know who their friends (and enemies) really are should not lead to complacency however. Just as in europe for the last 30 years, american universities are the battleground for the minds of future opinion formers in  the USA. Arab  countries are very active in sponsoring professorships at american universities, even whole departments. And the whole panoply of anti-Israel activities are in full swing.Those who care about Israel in the US should not be complacent as the present anti-Israelism seen in much of old europe began with the arab propaganda effort in the universities.

To some extent the fruits of the arab effort in the USA is already bearing its poisoned fruit. Those who are anti-Israel are increasingly being seen in those who have a university education, with 20% of those with a degree favoring the palestinian arabs over Israel.

So the more educated you are nowadays, the more indoctrinated you will be against the only state in the middle east which gives full equality to citizens no matter what their religion, the only country where arabs are free to lead their lives in equality and without fear of expressing themselves.

The only country in the middle east where a christian can plan his future in safety, where he can see his family grow without one or more daughters being kidnapped and forcibly converted to islam is the country that arab dictatorships are successfully portraying to educated americans as 'apartheid'.

What a world.

Obama State Dept nominee Hagel: Israel is Keeping 'Palestinians Caged Up Like Animals'

Obama bows low before Saudi King Abdullah presiding over gender genoicde, murder of homosexuals, domestic servants and christians

If Clinton wasn't willing enough to do Obama's dirty work when it comes to attacking Israel, we are now getting a glimpse at what Hagel as Secretary of State will be like as regards Israel. This man with his ludicrous comments about 'caged palestinians' and support for Iran has no sympathy whatsoever for the US only ally in the middle east. All this whilst Israel is faced with radical states around all its borders (Jordan is maintaining the coldest of peace with Israel whilst attacking it in international forums, all in a possibly vain attempt to appease and hold back the islamist tide there), and a raging civil war on its northern border with Syria.
Just last week Obama gave yet another hint as to his visceral hatred of Israel when saying that Israel's 'behaviour' will bring about its destruction. Obama is presently delivering 200 Abrams tanks and 20 F16's to Egypt to underline his 'goodwill' towards Israel. Obama is not on record criticising any other country in such terms as he's used against Israel and its leaders.

The next four years are going to be rocky for Israel (to some extent mitigated by ), as I forecast time and again before Obama's re-election by an ever naive US public, victim of a snake oil salesman. Like that great country the USA, Israel will still be there and thriving long after this administration and its president have become just a footnote in history.

 By Rachel Hirshfeld

In recently revealed comments, President Barack Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense Chuck Hagel made staggering accusations against Israel, alleging that the Jewish state is keeping the “Palestinians caged up like animals.”

Hagel was quoted as making the comments on January 12, 2003 by The Lincoln Journal Star, The Washington Free Beacon revealed on Tuesday.

The highly controversial nominee does not elaborate on the claim or explain how he believes Israel is keeping “Palestinians caged up like animals,” according to the Journal Star report. The comment is, however, consistent with his long anti-Israel and anti-Jewish record.

In 2007, he made a similar accusation, saying that Israel has kept the Palestinian people “chained down for many, many years.”

Don't just blame Obama, the sickness is pervasive

Until I read the below article I believed that the death of US ambassador Stephens in Libya was basically his own fault. This ambassador who gained his political awareness through the 'Peace Corps' and graduated fully identifying with palestinian aims to destroy the State of Israel, whose last post was as political officer in the rabidly anti-Israel environment of the US East Jerusalem consulate fully identified with arab and islamic culture and aims. Who better to represent the USA? Traitor to the USA, western civilisation and enemy of Israel Stephens might have been, but it seems he didn't have a death wish. 

The news reports most likely put out by Obama's damage limiting Clinton and the State Department said Stephens had rejected a strong US security team in favour of a Libyan one. Stephens was after all the arab friend, promoted islamist goals and hated Israel. What better credentials for an ambassador to Libya? Of course none of this washed with those who were after the head of a kuffr ambassador of the USA whose usefulness would be most expressed by his death.

It now seems that the USA had a drone in the air above the CIA hideout which was used as a fallback position once the americans were driven out of the embassy in Benghazi. Clinton and Obama very likely watched Stephen's murder along with other US citizens without lifting a finger. US ships with massive airpower were within striking distance only a few minutes away but no La Drang style 'broken arrow' operation was launched which could have saved the situation. The ambassador was sacrificed whilst his superiors went through the motions of doing something.  Many hours were wasted in bringing a special team over from the european mainland. By that time the ambassador and four innocent americans lay dead, their bodies mutilated.

The USA has lost the will to protect not only its allies but even its very most important symbols of state. It's ironic that the best friend the arab world had, a man who identified himself not with the USA but with the cause of its enemies was chosen to be Obama's gift in furtherance of the cause of arab and islamic radicalism. I hope eastern asian states have taken notice facing as they are a newly aggressive China. China which like radical islam and arabs has noticed that the USA nowadays has lost the will to support its own interests and those it used to call 'allies' is conducting provocations all around the China Sea region with little protest, warnings or signs of support to its allies from the USA.

The USA nowadays abandons its allies and funds its enemies such as with the case of Egypt. No enemy must be allowed to pay for its nefarious works, no enemy civilian may be hurt even inadvertently thus limiting the ability to protect even the most vital symbols of the US.
The USA has such reserves of strength, it can afford to have the odd Carter and Obama who love US enemies more than their own country and allies. But the damage to the US reputation takes decades to repair. Obama will not be forgotten by arab countries terrified of being overrun by Iran. Israel will not forget that a formerly peaceful Egypt was handed over to the Muslim Brotherhood by Obama, with Libya's weapons being  used to complicate an already serious situation in Israel's south. 

We must watch with baited breath whilst americans vote for a new president. I can't believe that the american people once burned are stupid enough to wish for a second helping of Obama but should the US president who hates his own adopted country be voted in again, it will be fascinating to see just how much western civilisation and peaceful norms of behaviour will be supplanted in favour of tyranny and barbarism.

'They Watched, and Our People Died' in Benghazi'

A US drone was hovering over the US Consulate in Benghazi last month as Al Qaeda-linked terrorists murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens.
By Chana Ya'ar

An American unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was hovering over the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 during the attack in which bloodthirsty Al Qaeda-linked terrorists murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.

The military backup that should have been racing to the scene, launched in response by those monitoring the Predator drone and other reconnaissance aircraft, moved too slowly and came too late, charged a former CIA commander.

Gary Berntsen told CBS News this week that the savage attack on the consulate was observed in detail by top officials at the U.S. Defense Department as it took place. Terrorists armed with AK-47 assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) launched a full-scale attack on both the consulate building itself, and the “safe house” located a short distance away.

It was to the second building, which also allegedly housed CIA operations, that Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other American diplomats had been taken in the hopes of keeping them out of harm's way. But the effort failed, with the diplomats and their security guards overwhelmed by the numbers, weaponry and military nature of the attacking force.

American Defense Department officials were too slow to respond when they saw what was happening, charged Berntsen, and didn't send in the troops fast enough.

“They stood, and they watched, and our people died,” he raged. “They made zero adjustments in this. You find a way to make this happen. There isn't a plan for every single engagement. Sometimes you have to be able to make adjustments.”

Sources told CBS there were fighter jets and Specter AC-130 gunships stationed at three nearby bases. But Pentagon officials told reporters the military moved a special ops team from central Europe to Sigonella, Italy instead – an hour's flight from Libya – and refused to provide further details.

A White House source told the network that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey “looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies.”

By then, the screaming mob of thousands of radical Islamists, whipped into a bloodthirsty frenzy, had torched the cars on the site, torn the building apart, and destroyed the consulate. And four American diplomats were dead.

According to a report published by The New York Times, witnesses have identified Ahmad Abu Khattala as the ringleader of the attack.

But Libyan authorities have not arrested him, nor has he been taken into custody. In fact, he gave the newspaper an interview as he sipped a milkshake on a hotel patio, mocking both the Libyan and U.S. governments.

“Here I am, sitting in a hotel with you,” he pointed out. “I'm even going to pick up my sister's kids from school soon.”

Ambassador Stevens repeatedly noted in communiques to Washington that weak security was an issue at the consulate. He noted in June there had been a spike in attacks against “international organizations and foreign interests,” ABC News reported. In August, he sent a cable warning of a series of violent incidents that “dominated the political landscape during the Ramadan holiday.”

The ambassador underscored to his superiors at the State Department  that the attacks were “organized” and that Libyan security personnel was not a “stabilizing force.” He also noted that the Libyan security force provided “little deterrence” – a major red flag that Washington apparently ignored.

Repeated requests to the Obama administration for additional security to the consulate in Benghazi were rejected.

Whatever the West does it will misinterpreted by islamic regimes and their peoples

Radical muslim 'grievances' are constant and limitless, whether over films or cartoons or of the western lifestyle or of actions of western leaning regimes. If we wish to assauge the grievances we need to convert to islam, adopt an islamic lifestyle and make sure we are the right brand of sunni/shia for that land (look forwards to a life of discrimination and much worse if you get it wrong). 
Moderate muslims exist, possibly in large numbers but outside of europe it is normally the radicals and those influenced by them who hold the reigns of power.
Barry Rubin reminds us that even those regimes outwardly friendly to the US (and non-islamic nations by extension) are subject to massive propaganda efforts undermining the attitudes and policies of muslim peoples and governments to the west. Unpopular regimes will always use the topics of palestinians and 'western colonialism' and 'imperialism' to further their own ends.
The best policy for nations which value their cultures and traditions are to take islamic 'grievances' with a large pinch of salt and realise that those making them are often interested less in resolving any grievance than in overthrowing tolerance and plurality where it exists. 
Needless to say, in islamic countries little tolerance for anything non islamic/not the right brand of islam ever exists so 'grievances' are usually just another weapon used by radicals in the war to introduce sharia.

They got it right: America is Their Enemy
by Barry Rubin

One of President Barack Obama’s main themes has been to convince Middle Eastern Islamists and Arabs generally that America is not their enemy. But the reason this strategy never works is that the radicals, be they Islamists or nationalists, know better. They see the United States as their enemy and they are right to do so.

No amount of sympathy, empathy, economic aid, apology, or appeasement will change this fact. Nor did such efforts succeed in making either Obama or the United States popular in such circles and the tens of millions of people influenced by them.  The only thing surprising about all of this is that so few “experts” and politicians seem to comprehend it.

There are a number of reasons why this is true, though many people mistakenly think they must find just one factor that explains this reality. The causes of this enmity include:

–American policies. True, the United States has supported Israel and also many Arab regimes over the years — including countries like Morocco, Tunisia, post-Qadhafi-Libya, Egypt, pre-Hizballah Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, post-Saddam Iraq, and the United Arab Emirates. The Islamists are equally unhappy with the U.S. support for the Palestinian Authority.

In short, U.S. support for any non-radical regime makes radicals angry and will always do so.

So what if the United States is nice to radical or Islamist regimes? Will that help?

No. The radicals still keep their goals — which include throwing U.S. influence out of the region and overthrowing its allies — no matter what Washington tries to do to please them. In the context of their ideology, they interpret U.S. concessions as signs of weakness which thus invite them to become even more militant and aggressive.

In Libya and Iraq, the governments have been pretty much directly installed by America. Thus, anyone who wants to overthrow those governments has a strong vested interest in hating and attacking Americans. The assassination of the ambassador to Libya wasn’t an accident or the result of a video but the inevitable and logical outcome of the political situation there.

As for Israel, giving that country less help would not change the radical view. Only if the United States had the same policy as Hamas, Hizballah, and the Muslim Brotherhood might it be forgiven. Merely putting more space between the United States and Israel, to paraphrase Obama’s stated intention, won’t do it. Even brokering a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, which isn’t going to happen of course, won’t help.

On the contrary, the radicals — especially Hamas, its Egyptian backers, Hizballah, and its Iranian backers — would go into a frenzy of denunciation and attempts to destroy the arrangements, which would be blamed on America. In the Middle East, peacemakers aren’t blessed, they’re assassinated.

The ultimate attempt to do away with these problems would be if U.S. policy would actually help Islamist regimes into power, give them money, and whitewash their extremism. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? And we can all see the results have not been good, neither in terms of U.S. interests nor even in terms of U.S. popularity.

–American values and culture. While the mere fact that a highly secular, largely hedonistic, and generally free lifestyle is practiced in the United States raises the Islamists’ ire, there is far more involved here.
continued

What better candidate could the USA have to represent itself at a human rights conference?

 If there is one act which exemplifies just how rotten the Obama administration is, it is the cynical appointment of a man who blamed jews for 9/11, who has praised Hamas and Hizbollah to represent the US at the OSCE human rights conference. I eagerly await the American People's verdict on this disastrous and racist president, a man who has done more than anything to roll back civilisation in the middle east and the respect for the cause of human rights throughout the world.

Obama sends arms via islamist Turkey to support the Muslim Brotherhood's agents in Syria, has brought the MB to power in place of an ally. The MB is responsible for the lethal attacks on christians throughout the muslim world. Just as the established churches have no interest in saving their brethren (saving their animus and influence for attacks on Israel) the US government cheers on its detractors. Last week Congress hesitated to sign off on an Obama request to throw another 1/2 billion dollars into the  lap of the Muslim Brotherhood after it ransacked the US embassy in Cairo.
The Chinese are also laughing at the US whilst rattling war drums and occupying islands throughout South East Asia. The US might sail its aircraft carriers into the Persian Gulf and down the South China Sea but none of its enemies loses any sleep over it. They are laughing whilst Obama plays at gunboat diplomacy. He knows what he is doing is just a sop to public opinion and the USA's enemies also know it. The US rebalancing into asia has not deterred China one iota from its beligerent actions against Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines.

Obama has done so much to the defence of democracies and of human civilisation, has undermined human rights so much in recent years that it is only fitting that he sends a racist, a liar and an islamist to represent the USA. Muhammad Morsy could not have proposed a better candidate.

It would be inconceivable for Barack Obama to appoint a man who had praised the Ku Klux Klan to a commission discussing race relations; what he has actually done, however, is all too predictable. Obama has appointed a man who has praised Hamas and Hizballah, and blamed Israel for 9/11, to be the United States’ representative at the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) annual 10-day human rights conference, the Human Dimension Implementation Meetings (HDIM).

The Obama State Department is sending Salam al-Marayati, founder and executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), to the OSCE conference. The foremost problem with this appointment is that al-Marayati was one of the first 9/11 truthers out of the box, ready with an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory on the very day of the attacks. On September 11, 2001, al-Marayati appeared on a radio show in Los Angeles to discuss the jihad attacks in New York and Washington, and said: “If we’re going to look at suspects, we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts attention from what’s happening in the Palestinian territories so that they can go on with their aggression and occupation and apartheid policies.”
These remarks are not anomalous for al-Marayati, who has claimed that the jihad terrorist group Hizballah is working for “liberation and resistance,” and has refused to call it a terrorist group. Likewise, al-Marayati has said optimistically that Hizballah’s Sunni counterpart Hamas will eventually gain acceptance:

Yesterday’s terrorists in the Middle East are today’s leaders. The PLO is the number one example of this. … The PLO 35 years ago was considered a terrorist organization, nobody should deal with them. … But they became the people in authority, in Palestine, today. So Hamas today, the way it’s being viewed, is exactly how the PLO was viewed 30 years ago. And in fact, even Hamas in terms of its social and educational operations is doing exactly what the PLO was doing 35 years ago, as well as its quote unquote military operations.

Understandably, Jewish groups are unhappy with the appointment. Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, declared:
One would assume that individuals selected to represent the United States at an international human rights conclave would share our government’s longstanding policy that Hamas and Hezbollah are dangerous terrorist organizations. But Mr. Salam al-Marayati and his organization are long-time advocates that these deadly terror groups be removed from the U.S. terrorist list.

continued

Love America, meanwhile in Gaza..............

 The Elder of Ziyon's put up some posters showing Israel's love for the USA, a love for a democratic nation, which is like Israel a light to the world.

That light does not reach into many of the dark places in Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and many other countries in the arab world, and americans are beginning to wake up to that fact.

Congress's refusal of that treacherous president Obama's promised emergency present to Egypt's islamists of half a billion dollars just days after Morsi sent his thugs in to ransack the US embassy, itself just after the lynching of an american ambassador and his staff in Libya gives cause for hope.




It's time that the US stopped funding those who hate it in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Egypt, in Libya............

The USA funds Pakistan with $billions and sellers of US flags there are doing a roaring trade, such gratitude......

 The list is almost endless in the islamic world. Hopefully when that enemy of western values and civilization Obama is gone from the White House a new policy of supporting America's allies and devastating its foes will return.

Such love for the USA in Pakistan. In Kashmir they never forget the little Satan either

 However much love the US shows the Muslim Brotherhood and Pakistan, americans will continue to be killed by the same bigots who are still persecuting 13 year old Rimsha Masih in Pakistan on trumped up blasphemy charges. Today we read of more of these stupid blasphemy charges (stupid but lethal) happening to young coptic christian boys in Egypt.

Pakistan still won't drop the blasphemy charges on this poor christian girl even after proof of her being framed

 Only muslims are entitled to their honor, to not be insulted, to live their lives in peace. Israel and the USA must however have their citizens always be on tenterhooks lest they offend those who make it their business to be offended. Jews and Christians and now  Hindus and buddists must always on the lookout for religion fueled madmen, indoctrinated for years in madrassas and driven on by their mullahs and their ayatollas with promises of paradise and virginal women and searching for blasphemers to condemn and to mutilate and to kill in horrible ways:

A 'blasphemer' burned to death in Pakistan

 And whilst citizens in europe, the USA and Israel even now after decades of arab bad faith in always upping the ante, making new demands, try to find ways to accomodate palestinian arabs, those same arabs in Gaza and Judea and Samaria (West Bank) spend their time indoctrinating their kids for jihad and working out ways to destroy the State of Israel (and establish the caliphate by taking over the West including the US).

Brought up to hate and 'love death'

This Gazan woman can't think of nicer places to take her grandchildren

I don't really subscribe to the 'why don't moderate muslims speak out' when living in muslim countries. Moderate muslims who speak out are like moderate christians who speak out. They end up dead. Why moderate muslims from the safety of western countries don't speak out and condemn the bigots, the fascist islamists amongst them is hard to understand.

It's too much to expect Obama to wave the big stick at US enemies

Batting for Turkey's islamists

The only country Obama would really like to hit is Israel. In this presidency there has not been a week when Obama's minions have not attacked Israel, a constant invective he's directed against Israel over the last four years. He snubbed Netanyahu when he visited the White House, created a diplomatic storm over jewish villages in Judea and Samaria whilst ignoring the constant incitement against jews, and over indefensible 1967 lines, and distorted Israel's claims to Israel (peddling the lie in Cairo that Israel's claim to Israel rests on the Holocaust). Even last week the CIA was used to as cover for a new calumny about Israel spying on the USA.

Not one week without some bashing of Israel by Clinton or others of the Obama administration.

We need to go back and remember Obama's trying to pull a fast one in imposing the Auschwitz borders on Israel when Netanyahu came to the USA.



Despite Netanyahu having been ambushed, his response at the White House press conference with Obama was masterful, as was his address to Congress. The reception Netanyahu got was nothing but a slap in the face for Obama and Israel's enemies.




The US people understand that Israel and the USA face the same enemies, that Israel is the USA's only true ally in the region.